A Mission of Integrity

by | Apr 20, 2018

I have always been fascinated by American politics and never moreso than in the last few months while the current events appears in the media on a daily basis. I will preface however that this is not a political post, I am far from qualified to comment on politics and like to see myself more as an interested spectator.

For a few days now the 730 Report (ABC network) has been advertising an interview with James Comey, former FBI Director and Leigh Sales. It was on my must watch list for a Thursday night.

Without going into too much detail of the interview and the ‘politics’, I was particularly interested in the responses that Comey provided about decisions he made that may have impacted the outcome of the 2016 American election. Sales was relentless in her questioning of the perceived double standards in what was communicated to the public, specifically around the timing of revealing investigations in to Hilary Clinton for a second time just two weeks out from the election. A down to earth kind of fellow, Comey calmly explained that as a leader in his position, the key influencer of his decisions laid purely in public trust, and in no way the political factors. Several times he commented that the FBI are not about politics, but about preserving the trust in the US judicial system. Comey went onto say that he felt that there were two options for him 1) the bad, whereby the investigations are revealed with transparency, and with the possibility of a detrimental impact to the election or 2) the catastrophic – whereby the FBI withheld this information and revealed it after a potentially successful campaign by Clinton. He said he felt at the time – and still does – that the second option would yield a more negative impact on the integrity of the (FBI) department. He quoted “You’ve got to choose bad everyday over catastrophic”.

In the world of the FBI, bad and catastrophic are probably all too familiar – they deal with the most serious and sensitive information. And in a work environment, I feel that HR leaders also find themselves dealing with serious and sensitive information on a regular basis. Decisions are made to uphold the values and principles of the organisation, to provide fairness, to act with integrity, and to do so with a level of transparency that is often misunderstood. We weigh up decisions with context and precedence in mind, drawing facts and insights (often in a vacuum), and we have to look to the decision that provides the leastimpact. Where decisions are often misinterpreted is through lack of insight and assumptions by outsiders looking in. Decisions are unfairly judged as flawed and often draw excessive criticism. Where is comes together though is acting consistently through values, ethics and empathy. And this is where HR leaders can build credibility-and integrity.

Regardless of political views and the finer complexities of Comey’s time at the Whitehouse, what I found notable was his mission of integrity around this public trust. Sometimes its clear that the right and fair decision has been made, but other times, no one person knows the full context, or is qualified to judge. Its through acting to a set of values and with the most ethical of approaches in a consistent way that trust and credibility come up trumps. Err, I mean, tops.


Recent Posts


You may also like…

Priming your Team for Performance and High Potential

Priming your Team for Performance and High Potential

If you are from Melbourne Australia, you know how lucky we are to have the Australian Open on our doorstep. Now I am not a big fan of tennis, but I do like to watch live games and be around the atmosphere of the Open. You might be wondering why I’m talking about...

What is the role of the leader in crafting culture?

What is the role of the leader in crafting culture?

I have been predominantly working in the space of culture over the last year as we face into challenges like reconnecting our teams, re-designing ways of working for our hybrid environments and resetting our boundaries  I was asked on a podcast interview recently...

Certainty Down, Communication Up

Certainty Down, Communication Up

When certainty goes down, communication should go up. During times of uncertainty, people will make up their own version of the truth in order to create certainty-even if it's not true or practical. It’s a human need to want a level of certainty, and some people...